| No Liquor Sales | ||
|  
      
     Women appear to be more vulnerable than men to many adverse consequences of alcohol use. Women achieve higher concentrations of
  alcohol in the blood and become more impaired than men after drinking equivalent amounts of alcohol. Research also suggests that
  women are more susceptible than men to alcohol-related organ damage and to trauma resulting from traffic crashes and interpersonal
  violence. This Alcohol Alert examines gender differences in alcohol's effects and considers some factors that may place
  women at risk for alcohol-related problems. Prevalence of Women's Drinking Household surveys indicate that alcohol use is more prevalent among men than women in the United States (1,2). In one survey,
  34 percent of women reported consuming at least 12 standard drinks1 during the previous year compared with 56 percent
  of men (1). Among drinkers surveyed, 10 percent of women and 22 percent of men consumed two or more drinks per day on average (1).
  Men are also more likely than women to become alcohol dependent (3).2 Women’s drinking is most common between ages 26 and 34 and among women who are divorced or separated (2). Binge drinking
  (i.e., consumption of five or more drinks per occasion on 5 or more days in the past month) is most common among women ages 18 to
  25 (2). Among racial groups, women's drinking is more prevalent among whites, although black women are more likely to drink
  heavily (1). Metabolism Women absorb and metabolize alcohol differently than men. In general, women have less body water than men of similar body
  weight, so that women achieve higher concentrations of alcohol in the blood after drinking equivalent amounts of alcohol (5,6). In
  addition, women appear to eliminate alcohol from the blood faster than men. This finding may be explained by women’s higher
  liver volume per unit lean body mass (7,8), because alcohol is metabolized almost entirely in the liver (9). Consequences of Alcohol Use Research suggests that women are more vulnerable than men to alcohol-related organ damage, trauma, and legal and interpersonal
  difficulties. Liver Damage. Compared with men, women develop alcohol-induced liver disease over a shorter period of time and
  after consuming less alcohol (10,11). In addition, women are more likely than men to develop alcoholic hepatitis and to die from
  cirrhosis (12). Animal research suggests that women’s increased risk for liver damage may be linked to physiological effects of
  the female reproductive hormone estrogen (13). Brain Damage. Views of the brain obtained by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) suggest that women may be more
  vulnerable than men to alcohol-induced brain damage. Using MRI, researchers found that a brain region involved in coordinating
  multiple brain functions was significantly smaller among alcoholic women compared with both nonalcoholic women and alcoholic men.
  These differences remained significant after measurements were adjusted for head size (14). Conversely, a study measuring
  metabolic energy utilization in selected brain regions found a significant difference between alcoholic and nonalcoholic men but
  no significant difference between alcoholic and nonalcoholic women (15). These results are not consistent with a greater
  vulnerability to alcoholic brain damage in women. However, the female alcoholics reported less severe alcohol use compared with
  the male alcoholics studied (15). Heart Disease. Men and women who consume one or two alcoholic drinks per day have a lower death rate from
  coronary heart disease (e.g., heart attacks) than do heavier drinkers and abstainers, as discussed in Alcohol Alert No. 45,
  "Alcohol and Coronary Heart Disease" (16). Among heavier drinkers, research shows similar rates of
  alcohol-associated heart muscle disease (i.e., cardiomyopathy) for both men and women, despite women's 60 percent lower lifetime
  alcohol use (17). Breast Cancer. Many studies report that moderate to heavy alcohol consumption increases the risk for breast
  cancer (18), although one recent study found no increased breast cancer risk associated with consumption of up to one drink per
  day, the maximum drinking level reported by most women (19). Violent Victimization. A survey of female college students found a significant relationship between the amount of
  alcohol the women reported drinking each week and their experiences of sexual victimization (20). Another study found that female
  high school students who used alcohol in the past year were more likely than nondrinking students to be the victims of dating
  violence (e.g., shoving, kicking, or punching) (21). A history of heavy premarital drinking by both partners has been found to predict first-year aggression among newlyweds (22).
  In some studies, problem drinking by wives has been linked to husband-to-wife aggression regardless of the husbands’ drinking
  levels (23). Traffic Crashes. Although women are less likely than men to drive after drinking (1,24) and to be involved in
  fatal alcohol-related crashes (25), women have a higher relative risk of driver fatality than men at similar blood alcohol
  concentrations (26). Laboratory studies of the effects of alcohol on responding to visual cues and other tasks suggest that
  there may be gender differences in how alcohol affects the performance of driving tasks (27). Women’s lower rates of drinking and driving may be attributed to their lower tendency toward risk taking compared with men
  (28,29). Women are also less likely to view drinking and driving as acceptable behavior. In a 1990 national household survey, 17
  percent of women, compared with 27 percent of men, agreed that it was acceptable for a person to drink one or two drinks
  before driving (30). Nevertheless, the proportion of female drivers involved in fatal crashes is increasing. In 1996, 16 percent
  of all drivers involved in alcohol-related fatal crashes were women, compared with 13 percent in 1986 and 12 percent in 1980 (25). Risk Factors for Women's Alcohol Use Factors that may increase women’s risk for alcohol abuse or dependence include genetic influences, early initiation of
  drinking, and victimization. Genetic Factors. The relative contribution of genetic factors to women’s risk for alcoholism has been debated.
  A survey of 2,163 female twins revealed greater similarity between identical twins compared with fraternal twins on measures of
  alcohol consumption (31). Similar studies including more than 12,000 twin pairs from the general population have confirmed that
  among both male and female twin pairs, identical twins are more likely than fraternal twins to have similar rates of alcohol
  dependence, alcohol abuse, and heavy alcohol consumption (32,33). Studies of women who had been adopted at birth have shown a significant association between alcoholism in adoptees and their
  biological parents (34). In addition, antisocial personality (e.g., aggressiveness) in biological parents may predict
  alcoholism in both male and female adoptees (35). However, potential interactions between genetic and environmental influences
  require further study. Using laboratory animals, researchers are currently attempting to identify gender-specific genetic factors whose interactions
  might contribute to differential sensitivity to alcohol’s effects (36). Age of Initiating Drinking. Results of a large nationwide survey show that more than 40 percent of persons who
  initiated drinking before age 15 were diagnosed as alcohol dependent at some point in their lives (37). Rates of lifetime
  dependence declined to approximately 10 percent among those who began drinking at age 20 or older. The annual rate of this decline
  was similar for both genders (37). Although in the past women generally started drinking at later ages than men, more recent
  survey data show that this difference has nearly disappeared (2). Victimization. Using data collected in a large general population survey, Wilsnack and colleagues (38) found that
  women who reported being sexually abused in childhood were more likely than other women to have experienced alcohol-related
  problems (e.g., family discord or household accidents) and to have one or more symptoms of alcohol dependence. Another study found
  that women in alcoholism treatment were significantly more likely to report childhood sexual abuse and father-to-daughter verbal
  aggression or physical violence compared with women in the general population (39). Widom and colleagues (40) reached a different conclusion from that of Miller and colleagues. Instead of relying on women's
  recall of their pasts, Widom and colleagues consulted court records to identify cases of childhood physical or sexual abuse. These
  researchers found that for women, a history of childhood neglect, but not abuse, significantly predicted the number of
  alcohol-related symptoms experienced, independent of parental alcohol or other drug (AOD) problems, childhood poverty, race, and
  age. Physical abuse during adulthood has also been associated with women's alcohol use and related problems. One study found that
  significantly more women undergoing alcoholism treatment experienced severe partner violence (e.g., kicking, punching, or
  threatening with a weapon) compared with other women in the community. In addition, among women in the community group, those with
  AOD-related problems reported significantly higher rates of severe partner violence than women without such problems. Although the
  findings indicate that partner violence and AOD problems co-occur among women, the data do not indicate whether the association is
  causal (41).  
     Are Women More Vulnerable to Alcohol’s Effects?—A Commentary by NIAAA Director Enoch Gordis, M.D. As can be seen by the varied types of information reported on in this Alcohol Alert, the alcohol research field has
  begun to recognize the importance of understanding gender differences in how alcohol is used, in the consequences of alcohol use,
  and in the development of alcohol dependence. For example, where women and men drink at the same rate, women continue to be at
  higher risk than are men for certain serious medical consequences of alcohol use, including liver, brain, and heart damage. We
  know that some of this risk is due to gender differences in metabolism; it also could quite possibly be due to gender-related
  differences in brain chemistry, in genetic risk factors, or to entirely different factors that are currently unknown. The more
  science can tell us about gender-related aspects of alcohol-related problems—not only what they are but why—the better job we
  will be able to do to prevent and treat those problems in all populations.  
     References (1) NIAAA. Drinking in the United States: Main Findings From the 1992 National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiologic
  Survey (NLAES). U.S. Alcohol Epidemiologic Data Reference Manual. Vol. 6. 1st ed. Bethesda, MD: The Institute, 1998. (2)
  Su, S.S.; Larison, C.; Ghadialy, R.; et al. Substance Use Among Women in the United States. SAMHSA Analytic Series A-3.
  Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 1997. (3) Grant, B.F. Prevalence and correlates
  of alcohol use and DSM-IV alcohol dependence in the United States: Results of the National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiologic
  Survey. J Stud Alcohol 58(5):464-473, 1997. (4) American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical
  Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. Washington, DC: the Association, 1994. (5) Frezza, M.; Di Padova, C.;
  Pozzato, G.; et al. High blood alcohol levels in women: The role of decreased gastric alcohol dehydrogenase activity and
  first-pass metabolism. N Engl J Med 322(2):95-99, 1990. (6) Taylor, J.L.; Dolhert, N.; Friedman, L.; et al. Alcohol
  elimination and simulator performance of male and female aviators: A preliminary report. Aviat Space Environ Med
  67(5):407-413, 1996. (7) Li, T.K.; Beard, J.D.; Orr, W.E.; et al. Gender and ethnic differences in alcohol metabolism. Alcohol
  Clin Exp Res 22(3):771-772, 1998. (8) Kwo, P.Y.; Ramchandani, V.A.; O’Connor, S.; et al. Gender differences in
  alcohol metabolism: Relationship to liver volume and effect of adjusting for body mass. Gastroenterology 115(6):1552-1557,
  1998. (9) Levitt, M.D.; Li, R.; DeMaster, E.G.; et al. Use of measurements of ethanol absorption from stomach and intestine
  to assess human ethanol metabolism. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 3 (4):G951-G957, 1997. (10) Tuyns, A.J.,
  and Pequignot, G. Greater risk of ascitic cirrhosis in females in relation to alcohol consumption. Int J Epidemiol
  13(1):53-57, 1984. (11) Gavaler, J.S., and Arria, A.M. Increased susceptibility of women to alcoholic liver disease:
  Artifactual or real? In: Hall, P., ed. Alcoholic Liver Disease: Pathology and Pathogenesis. 2d ed. London, UK: Edward Arnold,
  1995. pp. 123-133. (12) Hall, P.M. Factors influencing individual susceptibility to alcoholic liver disease. In: Hall,
  P.M., ed., Alcoholic Liver Disease: Pathology and Pathogenesis. 2d. ed. London, UK: Edward Arnold, 1995. pp. 299-316. (13)
  Ikejima, K.; Enomoto, N.; Iimuro, Y.; et al. Estrogen increases sensitivity of kupffer cells to endotoxin. Alcohol Clin Exp
  Res 22(3):768-769, 1998. (14) Hommer, D.; Momenan, R.; Rawlings, R.; et al. Decreased corpus callosum size among
  alcoholic women. Arch Neurol 53(4):359-363, 1996. (15) Wang, G.J.; Volkow, N.D.; Fowler, J.S.; et al. Regional
  cerebral metabolism in female alcoholics of moderate severity does not differ from that of controls. Alcohol Clin Exp Res
  22(8):1850-1854, 1998. (16) NIAAA. Alcohol Alert No. 45: Alcohol and Coronary Heart Disease. Rockville, MD:
  the Institute, 1999. (17) Urbano-Marquez, A.; Estruch, R.; Fernández-Solá, J.; et al. The greater risk of alcoholic
  cardiomyopathy and myopathy in women compared with men. JAMA 274(2):149-154, 1995. (18) Smith-Warner, S.A.;
  Spiegelman, D.; Yaun, S.S.; et al. Alcohol and breast cancer in women: A pooled analysis of cohort studies. JAMA
  279(7):535-540, 1998. (19) Zhang, Y.; Kreger, B.E.; Dorgan, J.F.; et al. Alcohol consumption and risk of breast cancer: The
  Framingham Study revisited. Am J Epidemiol 149(2):93-101, 1999. (20) Gross, W.C., and Billingham, R.E. Alcohol
  consumption and sexual victimization among college women. Psychol Rep 82(1):80-82, 1998. (21) Malik, S.; Sorenson,
  S.B.; and Aneshensel, C.S. Community and dating violence among adolescents: Perpetration and victimization. J Adolesc Health
  21(5):291-302, 1997. (22) Leonard, K.E., and Roberts, L.J. Marital aggression, quality, and stability in the first year of
  marriage: Findings from the Buffalo Newlywed Study. In: Bradbury, T.N., ed. The Developmental Course of Marital Dysfunction.
  Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998. pp. 44-73. (23) Leonard, K.E., and Senchak, M. Alcohol and premarital
  aggression among newlywed couples. J Stud Alcohol/Suppl 11:96-108, 1993. (24) Kann, L.; Kinchen, S.A.;
  Williams, B.I.; et al. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance: United States, 1997. MMWR 47(SS-3):1-89, 1998. (25) Yi, H.;
  Stinson, F.S.; Williams, G.D.; et al. Trends in Alcohol-Related Fatal Traffic Crashes, United States, 1977-96. Surveillance
  Report No. 46. Bethesda, MD: NIAAA, 1998. (26) Zador, P.L. Alcohol-related relative risk of fatal driver injuries in
  relation to driver age and sex. J Stud Alcohol 52(4):302-310, 1991. (27) Waller, P.F., and Blow, F.C. Women,
  alcohol, and driving. In: Galanter, M., ed. Recent Developments in Alcoholism. Vol. 12. New York: Plenum Press, 1995. pp.
  103-123. (28) Wells-Parker, E.; Popkin, C.L.; and Ashley, M. Drinking and driving among women: Gender trends, gender
  differences. In: Howard, J.M.; Martin, S.E.; Mail, P.D.; et al., eds. Women and Alcohol: Issues for Prevention Research.
  NIAAA Research Monograph No. 32. Bethesda, MD: NIAAA, 1996. (29) Arnett, J.J.; Offer, D.; and Fine, M.A. Reckless driving
  in adolescence: ‘State’ and ‘trait’ factors. Accid Anal Prev 29(1):57-63, 1997. (30) Greenfield, T.K., and
  Room, R. Situational norms for drinking and drunkenness: Trends in the US adult population, 1979-1990. Addiction
  92(1):33-47, 1997. (31) Prescott, C.A., and Kendler, K.S. Longitudinal stability and change in alcohol consumption among
  female twins: Contributions of genetics. Development Psychopathology 8(4):849-866, 1996. (32) Kendler, K.S., and
  Prescott, C.A. Population-based twin study of alcohol abuse and dependence: Modeling gender differences. Am J Med Genet
  74(6):574, 1997. (33) Prescott, C.A.; Aggen, S.H.; and Kendler, K.S. Sex differences in the sources of genetic liability to
  alcohol abuse and dependence in a population-based sample of U.S. twins. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 23(7):1136-1144, 1999. (34)
  Bohman, M.; Sigvardsson, S.; and Cloninger, C.R. Maternal inheritance of alcohol abuse: Cross-fostering analysis of adopted
  women. Arch Gen Psychiatry 38(9):965-969, 1981. (35) Cadoret, R.J.; Yates, W.R.; Troughton, E.; et al. An adoption
  study of drug abuse/dependency in females. Compr Psychiatry 37(2):88-94, 1996. (36) Fernandez, J.R.; Vogler, G.;
  Tarantino, L.M.; et al. Sex-specific QTL influences in alcohol-related phenotypes: Analysis of an F2 population. Behav Genet
  27(6):589, 1997. (37) Grant, B.F., and Dawson, D.A. Age at onset of alcohol use and its association with DSM-IV alcohol
  abuse and dependence: Results from the National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiologic Survey. J Sub Abuse 9:103-110, 1997. (38)
  Wilsnack, S.C.; Vogeltanz, N.D.; Klassen, A.D.; et al. Childhood sexual abuse and women's substance abuse: National survey
  findings. J Stud Alcohol 58(3):264-271, 1997. (39) Miller, B.A.; Downs, W.R.; and Testa, M. Interrelationships
  between victimization experiences and women's alcohol use. J Stud Alcohol/Suppl 11:109-117, 1993. (40) Widom, C.S.;
  Ireland, T.; and Glynn, P.J. Alcohol abuse in abuse and neglected children followed-up: Are they at increased risk? J Stud
  Alcohol 56(2):207-217, 1995. (41) Miller, B.A. Partner violence experiences and women's drug use: Exploring the
  connections. In: Wetherington, C.L., and Roman, A.B., eds. Drug Addiction Research and the Health of Women. Rockville, MD:
  National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1998. pp. 407-416. 
 | ||